Who Supports the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement?

Leading U.S. Newspapers!

''Offering the Colombians anything less than access to economic growth would be unfair and damaging not only to them, but to us.''
—San Francisco Chronicle, June 13, 2007

"Denying Colombia duty-free access to U.S. markets — and denying American exporters such access to Colombian markets — wouldn't improve human rights for the 44 million Colombians.  The trade agreement should be approved."
 —Chicago Tribune, June 23, 2007

"Ratification of the trade promotion agreement would help consolidate Colombia's progress by bringing jobs and income to its people… It's time for Democrats to drop their strained human rights objections to the Colombia trade promotion agreement and deal with it on its merits."
 —Washington Post, November 9, 2007

"Helping Colombia is in our national interest.  It's about helping our strongest friend in the region, not about catering to a domestic interest group.  Unless Congress wants to send a signal that the United States either doesn't care or doesn't know who its friends are — there are fewer every day — lawmakers should extend Mr. Uribe a helping hand instead of giving him the back of the hand."
 —Miami Herald, July 24, 2007

''For Congress to now say that it is disgusted by the violence, particularly against one sector of the Colombia population, and to use that argument to undermine a free trade treaty, is a travesty.''
—The South Florida Sun-Sentinel, October 29, 2007

''Few countries in the Western Hemisphere have shown as much improvement on human rights and international crime issues as Colombia, but Democrats threaten they'll kill that deal, too.  That would have the odious effect of keeping some Colombian farmers in the illegal drug business.  Reducing barriers to trade would give Colombian farmers a better incentive to sell legal agricultural products.''
 —The Detroit News, August 12, 2007

"On a continent where anti-U.S. sentiment has been rising, Colombia is America's most steadfast friend."
 —Chicago Sun Times, June 29, 2006

"Now the Democratic-controlled Congress is balking at passing a painstakingly negotiated free trade agreement with Colombia.  This would be both a betrayal and a blunder — because free trade and economic growth are perhaps the only ways to help the country continue its progress from near-failed state to democratic government struggling toward a modicum of peace, prosperity and accountability after four decades of violence.  Colombians will view rejection of the agreement as a repudiation of their hard work and proof that U.S. protectionism trumps American promises about friendship, security and joint prosperity."
—Los Angeles Times, May 26, 2007

"At the same time, the agreement would bring down barriers in Colombia to U.S. exporters and investors.  That would create more jobs and opportunities for Americans."
 —Orlando Sentinel, March 2, 2006

"The twice-elected Mr. Uribe is the most far-sighted leader Colombia has had in decades, and his FTA is an attempt to align his country's future firmly with the hemisphere's free-market democracies.  Peru, Panama and Colombia are saying they want to be America's political and economic partners.  Do Democrats in Congress want to drive them into the arms of Mr. Chávez?"
 —Wall Street Journal, May 4, 2007

"Colombia is fighting a stubborn cocaine-fueled insurgency.  Its government has managed to hold a Marxist drug-fueled rebellion at bay and is a strong U.S. ally.  To leave them out of the trade partnership would be to betray a partner in democratic values… Congress should move quickly to pass the free trade pacts with Colombia and Panama and send Latin Americans the message that trade can lift everyone."
—Corpus Christi Caller-Times, December 9, 2007

"First, and foremost, the benefits of free trade are undeniable…  After years of democratization in the nations of Latin America, Venezuela — under cultish leader Hugo Chavez — has been turning toward collectivization.  Successful trade, one hopes, can only help to negate his status and foster market economies and greater freedom throughout the region."
—The Republican (Springfield, Massachusetts), December 9, 2007

"A group of Democratic leaders from the Clinton administration and Congress recently sent a letter to Congressional Democrats pointing out that rejecting the trade agreements signed in Latin America 'would set back regional U.S. interests for a generation.'  Their argument also works on a bigger map.  It would be a folly for the United States to turn its back on trade."
—The New York Times, November 7, 2007

Click to see a map of editorial locations around the country!

Op-Eds: